Ontological arguments for the existence of god alvin plantinga the ontological argument simplified lynne rudder baker and gareth b. Anselms ontological argument for the existence of god anselms argument is an a priori argument. This means that one cannot generalize upon a description xwithout rst asserting 9yy x. The ontological argument for the existence of god i. Teleological and cosmological arguments, for instance, demonstrate how the existence of god best explains apparent design in nature and the nature of causality, respectively. His empiricist epistemological principles rule out the possibility of any meaningful ontological argument. However, while the ontological argument may be valid, it remains to be shown that it is sound.
Ontology, the philosophical study of being in general, or of what applies neutrally to everything that is real. In order to show this, the individual premises of the ontological argument must be evaluated. Anselms name will forever be associated with the ontological argument for. Over the years it has been suggested that it is possible to construct deductive arguments for the existence of satan and other sorts of evil beings, modelled on anselms argument in the proslogium. In the ontological argument we start from a concept in the mind.
Speaks january 6, 2006 1 anselms presentation of the argument anselms argument begins with a statement of what god is. Gods existence, which holds that the idea of god in ones mind is evidence of a. Anselmss ontological argument is stated, and a few standard st. A brief critical introduction to the ontological argument and its formalization. However, the predicate logic of descriptions must be free, since these terms may. God is omnipotent, then he should be able to create a being with free will. In this paper we wish to discuss the ontological argument for the existence of god. The ontological argument in pvs john rushby computer science laboratory sri international, menlo park ca usa abstract the ontological argument, an 11th century proof of the existence of god, is a good candidate for fun with formal methods as nearly everyone nds the topic interesting. Specifically, the ontological argument reasons from the study of being ontology. Ontological arguments are arguments, for the conclusion that god exists, from premises which are supposed to derive from some source other than observation of the world e. Many arguments fall under the category of the ontological, but they tend to involve arguments about the state of being or existing. What is the ontological argument for the existence of god.
Anselm of canterbury was a neoplatonic realist and was. The ontological argument, with its a priori reasoning. The ontological argument begins with the claim that god, by definition, is infinitely great. This is an a prioriargument for the existence of god. Thus, a being that is omniscient lacks the ability to create free beings and is. Now we believe that you are are something than which nothing greater can be thought. One of the most fascinating arguments for the existence of an allperfect god is the ontological argument. Pdf ontological arguments are arguments, for the conclusion that god exists, from. It is the argument that, if one understands what is meant by the word god and follows it out to the logical conclusion, it is impossible for such a being not to exist.
Ontological arguments and belief in god by graham oppy. If that organizational structure is true, the argument will provide reasons why god must exist. Ontological arguments are arguments, for the conclusion that god exists, from premises which are supposed to derive from some source other than observation of the worlde. A modal ontological argument and leibnizs view of possible worlds nino b. Anselms a prioriargument for the existence of god today we will look at anselms ontological argument for the existence of god. Thus, the argument concludes that omniscience and omnipotence are logically incompatible. Anselm began with the concept of god as that than which nothing greater can be. Based upon this general rule, we can divide the existing arguments for the existence of god into three basic categories, starting from the kind of arguments that need the most premises and axioms.
Anselm developed a controversial a priori argument for the exis tence of god. A criticism of anselms ontological argument leaving. The ontological argument for the existence of god refers to the claim that the very logical possibility of gods existence entails his actuality. An ontological argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of a phenomenon that.
Jan 07, 2012 this feature is not available right now. The ontological argument for the existence of god is a classical christian argument that contends that the very concept of god logically and necessarily demands existence. Ontological argument is part of wikiproject atheism, which aims to organize, expand, clean up and guide wikipedia articles relating to atheism. Anselm sought out to prove gods existence strictly through reason and rationalism alone. On the logic of the ontological argument stanford university. Anselm, gaunilo, descartes, leibniz and kant ricardo sousa silvestre 1439 a mechanically assisted examination of begging the question in anselms ontological argument john rushby 1473 a tractarian resolution to the ontological argument erik thomsen 1497. The ontological argument 3 the ontological argument explained the ontological argument for the existence of a monotheistic god was first put forth by st. That which can be conceived not to exist is not god. It offers a comprehensive discussion of one of the most famous arguments for the existence of god. However, the predicate logic of descriptions must be free, since these terms may fail to denote. In the argument anselm states that god is a being, than which nothing greater can be conceived, and using logic he comes to the conclusion that god must exist by definition.
Ontological argument criticisms introduction to philosophy. Cocchiarella abstract we critically discuss an ontological argument that purports to prove not only that god, or a godlike being, exists, but in addition that gods existence is necessary. He was highly supportive of the teleological arguments for the. Pdf there is a hierarchy of arguments for the existence of god. Get an answer for why is the ontological argument of gods existence the best argument. We examine the famous ontological argument in proslogium ii. A 10 minute video microlesson that takes a quick look at anselm of canterburys cunning and controversial argument for the existence of god. The ontological argument for the existence of god is one of the few arguments originating in logic rather than observation.
In other words, ontological arguments are arguments from what are typically alleged to be none but analytic, a priori and necessary premises to the. The ontological argument in contrast to the previous three arguments which attempt to prove the existence of god by relying on sense experience known as a posteriori arguments, the ontological argument from the greek, ontos. We critically discuss an ontological argument that purports to prove not only that. It was called first philosophy by aristotle in book iv of his metaphysics. The argument for the ontological argument for many, the idea of existence as a predicate causes issues for the ontological argument.
The ontological argument from the proslogion, by anselm, bishop of canterbury c. In contrast, the ontological arguments are conceptual in roughly the following. Ontological arguments for satan and other sorts of evil. Godels ontological argument, in its different variants, is amongst the most discussed formal proofs in modern literature, and so most of its premises and inferential steps have been subject to. Anselm ontological argument san jose state university. A sound argument is one which is both valid and contains true premises chapter 2, writing philosophy. In this article tristan stone, head of religious studies and theology at harris westminster academy, defends the ontological argument and assesses its strengths. The main opponent to this version was kant and we did deal with his objection last week due to the fact that the distinction between anselms. Anselm 10331109 of canterbury was born in aosta, italy. For a critical account of verificationism see plantinga, god and other minds, chap. In this essay i shall describe anselms ontological argument and look at how it may prove gods existence. Can such ground be assumed, and if not, is the declaration even possible with out it.
That phrase, popular and useful as it is, probably doesnt bear up very well under close logical scrutiny for it seems to imply that there is some argument that is the ontological argument, an argument of which the eleventhcentury argument, the. Black lives matter assumes ontological ground, which propels the deployment of its terms and sustains them throughout the treacheries of antiblack epistemologies. Issn print 20553706 volume 5 journal of applied logics. I will then go on to look at criticisms of the argument from both gaunilo and kant to see if they can show that the argument does not work and if not, why not. This book is an interesting contribution to the philosophy of religion. A second ontological argument i rather than going these ways, descartes responded to the criticism by say that it is not \existence that is the important perfection, but ecessary existence. The ontological argument is widely thought to have been first clearly articulated by st. The ontological argument has been attacked through history most recently by richard dawkins in the god delusion.
Maydole ontological arguments are deductive arguments for the existence of god from general metaphysical principles and other assumptions about the nature or essence of god. What was particularly intetesting was seeing alvin plantingas rebuttal of the argument he would later come to support, although only after tweaking it which i think has really transormed it and is the most convincing form of it that ive ever read. Springer nature is making coronavirus research free. The latin term ontologia science of being was felicitously invented by the german philosopher jacob. From time to time such suggestions and similar proposals have also appeared in print. The mickey mouse guide to the ontological argument coauthored by gjw and mickey mouse wellington college department of philosophy and religion only the fool hath said in his heart that there is no god. Having receded from the forefront of intellectual thought after being refuted by st. The modal ontological argument center for philosophy of religion. Ontological argument for the gods existence internet.
The ontological argument would be meaningful only to someone who understands the essence of god completely. The ontological argument in pvs 1 introduction computer science. This paper presents the special issue on formal approaches to the ontological argument and briefly introduces the ontological argument from the standpoint of logic and philosophy of religion more. Ontological argument project gutenberg selfpublishing. More specifically, ontological arguments tend to start with a priori theory about the organization of the universe. This website and its content is subject to our terms and conditions. A central thesis of the book is that ontological arguments have no value in the debate between theists and atheists.
Anselm developed a controversial a priori argument for the existence of god. Essay on the ontological argument for the existence of god. Since this is a logically drawn conclusion, all versions of the ontological argument immediately fail. While there are several different versions of the argument, all purport to show that it is selfcontradictory to deny that there exists a greatest possible being. Aquinas reasoned that, as only god can completely know his essence, only he could use the argument. An ontological argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of a phenomenon that uses ontology. God, freedom, and evil alvin plantinga free download as pdf file. Anselm of canterbury, who defined god as the greatest conceivable being. Therefore, if that, than which nothing greater can be conceived, exists in the understanding alone, the very being, than which nothing greater can be conceived, is one, than which a greater can be conceived.
Anselms reasoning was that, if a being existed only in the mind but not in reality, then a greater being was conceivable a being which exists both in the mind and in reality. Ontological arguments for the existence of god, first discovered by st. Ontological arguments definition of ontological arguments. Anselms ontological argument for the existence of god. Tes global ltd is registered in england company no 02017289 with its registered office at 26 red lion square london wc1r 4hq. Outline the four classic proofs for gods existence. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article and visit the project page. There is only one major argument for gods existence that is a priori, deductive, and that was called the ontological argument by immanuel kant, though several versions of it predated kant by. Ontological argument the ontological argument is widely thought to have been first clearly articulated by st. In fact, his modal ontological argument is considered one of the most articulate and comprehensive arguments for the existence of god to date. Ontological argument, argument that proceeds from the idea of god to the reality of god. The ontological argument is an argument based not on observation of the world like the cosmological and teleological arguments but rather on reason alone. Feb 25, 2017 part of the atheist debates patreon project. Plantingas modal ontological argument includes many of the aspects of anselms original argument but includes various additions and changes.
The form of the argument is that of a reductio ad absurdum argument. Many arguments fall under the category of the ontological, and they tend to involve arguments about the state of being or existing. More specifically, ontological arguments tend to start with an a priori theory about the organization of the universe. Thomas aquinas in the th century, it was revived in the 17th century by rene des. The ontological argument, an 11th century proof of the existence of god. Descartes ontological argument i in the fifth meditation, descartes is considering various mathematical and conceptual truths i for instance, we know simply by analyzing the concept \triangle that the interior angles of a triangle equal two right angles i likewise, we know by the concept \mountain that wherever there is a mountain there is a valley. His rejection of the ontological argument caused other catholic theologians to also reject the argument. This argument for the existence of god has fascinated philosophers ever since anselm first stated it. The ontological argument kenneth einar himma modal versions of the ontological argument william rowe. The ontological argument alvin plantinga 1 the third theistic argument i wish to discuss is the famous ontological argument first formulated by anselm of canterbury in the eleventh century. We formalize the argument in pvs and verify its correctness. Ontological arguments stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. In other words, ontological arguments are arguments from what are typically alleged to be none but analytic. I shall take it for granted that the connection between what i call ontological arguments and traditional presenta tions of the ontological argument there is, of course, no one argument that can be called the ontological argument is plain.
I have to say, i think several of the objections presented against the ontological argument basically miss the mark. Conversely, a being that is omnipotent has the power to create free beings and hence does not know what such beings would do if they existed. An ontological argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of god that uses ontology. Reprinted by permission of open court publishing company, a division of carus publishing company, peru, il. About the work although anselms argument for gods existence presented in this article is based on predominately on reason, anselm presents the argument as clari.
759 1187 100 766 31 508 379 202 381 174 1316 415 1288 449 1256 1231 741 1258 253 1082 1118 926 975 523 504 358 497 81 1181 1020 664 493 1220 362 1195 155 1455 311 102